ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH STUDENTS’ READINESS IN FOLLOWING MICROTEACHING CLASSES IN THE SIXTH SEMESTER AT
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH STUDENTS’ READINESS IN FOLLOWING MICROTEACHING CLASSES IN THE SIXTH SEMESTER AT
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

Objective of this research was to determine the readiness of English students in following microteaching classes. This research design uses descriptive qualitative method. The respondents of this study were questionnaires that were answered by students readiness in following microteaching classes in the sixth semester of the 2019/2020 academic year. The results of this study: Based on the findings and discussion, there are three parts in the readiness activities, namely emotive attitudinal readiness, cognitive readiness, and behavioral readiness that are prepared by students’ in teaching practice. It can be concluded that students are ready in following microteaching classes. Researchers want to suggest to students that English students must be more prepared for readiness in following microteaching classes and for further researchers, it is also suggested for researchers used this research finding as a reference.

Keywords: Microteaching, Readiness, Teaching Practice

ANA MIASARI
NPM 1621110059

Pembimbing : Washlurachim Safitri, M.Pd

Penguji 1 : Kiagus Baluqiah, M.Pd

Penguji 2 : Yupika Maryansyah, M.Pd

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

08 Desember 2020

Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Bahasa Indonesia

Allen, D.W. & Ryan, K. A. (1969). Microteaching. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Allen, D. W. & Cooper, J. M. (1970). Microteaching: History and the present status. Washington, D.C: ERIC Clearing House on Teacher Education.
B.VinaKumari and D.GumartiBaskharaRao.(2004). Methods of teaching social studies. New Delhi: Dynamic Printer Delhi.
Brown, James Dean.1995.The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development. USA: Heile and Heilne Publishers

Chaman, LalBanga (2013) “Microteaching, an Efficient Technique for Learning Effective Teaching”

Grant, M.M. 2002. Getting A Grip of Project Based Learning : Theory, Cases and Recomandation. North Carolina :Meredian A Middle School Computer Technologies. Journal vol. 5.Kemdikbud. 2013. Model Pengembangan Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning). http//www.staff.uny.ac.id
Kurdi, M. (2015). Microteaching. Medical Education and Technology Workshop. Karnataka, India: Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences Hubli.
Maddox,Nick.MoniqueForte,andRobertBoozer.2000.Learning Readiness:An Underappreciated YetVital DimensioninExperientalLearning. JournalofDevelopmentsinBussinessSimulation&ExperientalLearning, Volume27.

Mirza, Yusuf (2010), Analyzed the readiness of students in implementing the field Experience Program (PPL)

Richard, Jack C.2001.Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Rabbinic, Roberto.2002.An Introduction to Syllabus Design an Evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal

Saputri, DeniAngga. (2016) “Analysis of Teachers Readiness in Teaching English to Young Learners atKindergartes (A Study of the Kindergartens in Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2016)”
Slameto.1995.Belajardan Faktor-Faktoryang Mempengaruhinya.Jakarta: RinekaCipta.

Sunarsih, I. (2017) A Study of Teaching Method designed by Students in the Lesson Plan at Microteaching classes.Bengkulu: Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Tarey, Relly.1988.Approaches to Foreign Language Syllabus Design. ERIC Digest
The George Lucas Educational Foundation. 2005. Instructional Module Project Based Learning. http//www.edutopia.org.modules/PBL/whatpbl.php.2005
Thomas, J.W. 2000. A Review of Research on Problem Based Learning. California : The Autodesk Foundation.Wrigley, H.S. 2003. Knowledge in Action : The Promise of Project Based Learning, Focus and Basic. Journal vol. 2.h.3.
Xiaotang, Cheng.Tt.Current Trends in Syllabus Design and Material Development