ANALYSIS OF MOVE STRUCTURE AND VERB TENSES IN STUDENTS' THESIS ABSTRACTS
(ENGLISH GRADUATES AT UMB IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018)

ANALYSIS OF MOVE STRUCTURE AND VERB TENSES IN STUDENTS' THESIS ABSTRACTS
(ENGLISH GRADUATES AT UMB IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018)

This research was intended to observe and describe the analysis of move structure and verb tense in students’ thesis abstracts made by english graduates at UMB in academic year 2017. The objective of the research was to know the most frequent move and the use of verb tense in thesis abstracts made by english graduates at UMB in academic year 2017. In this research, the researcher used descriptive method. The result of research showed that the most frequent move of thesis abstracts made by english graduates at UMB in academic year 2017 was Method move, and the use of verb tense in thesis abstracts made by english graduates at UMB in academic year 2017 are : present tense (background), past tense (purpose), past tense (method), past tense, (result), and present tense (conclusion). From the result above the researcher give suggest : The writer suggest to students who take thesis to learn more about thesis abstract, about the move stucture in abstract, the verb tense that use in thesis abatracts, so the students can write thesis abstract correctly.
 

RANITA AYU MARESTIKA
NPM : 1421110049

Supervisor : Ki Agus Baluqiah, M.Pd
Co-Supervisor : Fetriani, M.Pd

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM

upt

18/03/2021

MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

American National Standard Institute, Guidelines for Abstracts. http://niso.org/publications/ansiniso-z23914-1997-r205-guidelines-abstracts[accessed may 6 2018].

Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analizing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Declerck, Renaat. 2006. The Grammar of the English Tense System. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248905242_Tense_and_Time_in_Counterfactual_Conditionals [accessed may 11 2018].

Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary Discourse: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.

Jespersen, Otto 1954. A Modern English Grammar, Part IV. London: Allen and Unwin.
Sugiono, 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Schneider, K. P. And Barron, Anne 2004. Pragmatics of Discourse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. and Feak C. B. (1994). Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor: The University of MichiganPress.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, V. B. 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. (3rded.). University of Michigan Press.
Tseng, F. (2011). Analyses of Move Structure and Verb Tense of Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistic Journal. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27-39.
The University of Melbourne, Writing an Abstract. www.service.unimelb.edu.au/pdf-file[accessed may 6 2018].s

Ventola, E. 1994. Abstract as an Object of Linguistic Study. In S. Cmejrkova, F. Danes, & E. Havlova (Eds.). Writing vs speaking:Language, Text, Discourse, Communication (pp.333-352). Tubigen: Gunter Narr.
Weisberg, R. & Burker, S. 1990. Writing up Research: Experimental Research Report Writing for Student’s of English. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Wood, Frederick T 1954. The Grounwork of English Grammar. MacMillan & Co Ltd.http://teflpedia.com/Tense:_definition

pdf

bahasa indonesia

bahasa indonesia