DISPARITAS PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGEROYOKAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN SESEORANG ( Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu )
Dublin Core
Title
DISPARITAS PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGEROYOKAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN SESEORANG ( Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu )
Description
This research aims to examine the judicial reasoning
basis in deciding cases of criminal assault leading to
death in the judgments of the Bengkulu District Court
No.367/Pid.B/2019/PN Bgl and No.
20/Pid.B/2023/PN Bgl. It also elucidates the impact
of the criminal sentence disparities in Judges’
decisions on cases of fatal assault. The research
method used is normative juridical. The type of
research employed is normative legal research. In this
study, author uses a standard legal research approach,
analyzing the differences in criminal sentencing for
perpetrators of fatal assaults, sourced from the
judges’ decisions. The research findings indicate that
factors contributing to criminal sentence disparities
originate from the legal system (Continental
European Legal System), judicial-based criminal
disparities ,where the basis for decision-making must
consider the purpose of punishment, and defendantbased criminal disparities , where the imposition of
punishment is influenced by the dependant’s
aggravating and mitigating circumstances. The legal
consequences arising from criminal disparities
include the defendant feeling unfairly treated by the
judge, which may lead to lead to public antipathy
towards the legal system and our judicial institutions ,
potentially resulting in vigilantism without due
judicial process.
basis in deciding cases of criminal assault leading to
death in the judgments of the Bengkulu District Court
No.367/Pid.B/2019/PN Bgl and No.
20/Pid.B/2023/PN Bgl. It also elucidates the impact
of the criminal sentence disparities in Judges’
decisions on cases of fatal assault. The research
method used is normative juridical. The type of
research employed is normative legal research. In this
study, author uses a standard legal research approach,
analyzing the differences in criminal sentencing for
perpetrators of fatal assaults, sourced from the
judges’ decisions. The research findings indicate that
factors contributing to criminal sentence disparities
originate from the legal system (Continental
European Legal System), judicial-based criminal
disparities ,where the basis for decision-making must
consider the purpose of punishment, and defendantbased criminal disparities , where the imposition of
punishment is influenced by the dependant’s
aggravating and mitigating circumstances. The legal
consequences arising from criminal disparities
include the defendant feeling unfairly treated by the
judge, which may lead to lead to public antipathy
towards the legal system and our judicial institutions ,
potentially resulting in vigilantism without due
judicial process.
Creator
Jenny Noviantry
Rangga Jayanuarto
Riri Tri Mayasari
Sinung Mufti Hangabei
Betra Sarianti
Source
FAKULTAS HUKUM
Publisher
UPT PERPUSTAKAAN
Date
16 Februari 2024
Contributor
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH BENGKULU
Rights
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH BENGKULU
Format
PDF File
Language
BAHASA INDONESIA
Type
JURNAL REPOSITORY
Identifier
Bunga Rampai Komisi Yudisial RI 2014
Danu Surya Putra & Rehnalemken Ginting. 2018. Op. Cit.
Harkristuti Harkrisnowo. 2003 Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. 1984. Teori Teori Kebijakan
Pidana.
Oemar Seno Adji. Hukum-Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1984,
hlm. 28-29
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2010. Penelitian Hukum.
Soerjono Soekanto. 2006. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum.
Sulardi Sulardi & Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo. 2015. Kepastian
Hukum, Kemanfaatan, Dan Keadilan terhadap Perkara Pidana
Anak: Kajian Putusan Nomor 201/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Blt. Jurnal
Yudisial, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 8(3)
Danu Surya Putra & Rehnalemken Ginting. 2018. Op. Cit.
Harkristuti Harkrisnowo. 2003 Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. 1984. Teori Teori Kebijakan
Pidana.
Oemar Seno Adji. Hukum-Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1984,
hlm. 28-29
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2010. Penelitian Hukum.
Soerjono Soekanto. 2006. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum.
Sulardi Sulardi & Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo. 2015. Kepastian
Hukum, Kemanfaatan, Dan Keadilan terhadap Perkara Pidana
Anak: Kajian Putusan Nomor 201/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Blt. Jurnal
Yudisial, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 8(3)
Collection
Citation
Jenny Noviantry et al., “DISPARITAS PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGEROYOKAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN SESEORANG ( Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu ),” Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, accessed May 2, 2024, http://repo.umb.ac.id/items/show/3991.