ORAL READING MISCUEANALYSIS AMONG ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM STUDENTS IN THE FIRST SEMESTER OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

ORAL READING MISCUEANALYSIS AMONG ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM STUDENTS IN THE FIRST SEMESTER OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

The objectivesof this researchare to find out the types of reading miscueand to find out the dominant type of reading miscue found in the first semester students of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. The design of this study wasdescriptive method. The respondent of this study wasthe firstsemester students of English study program of Muhammadiyah Bengkulu who are enrolled reading subject in 2019/2020 Academic Year. There was only one class as the respondent of this research, it was class A with total number about 36 students. Since this research was a descriptive study, the researcher used table of checklist to find out the types of reading miscue based on Goodman et al (2005). There were two findingss of this research; (1) Types of reading miscue found in the first semester English students in University of Muhammadiyah Bengkulu were subtitution, insertion, omission, correction, repetition, and hesitation. (2) The most dominant type of reading miscue found in the first semester English students in University of Muhammadiyah Bengkulu was subtitution.

ERINA RAHMA DIA
NPM: 1521110018

Pembimbing:
Drs. Arasuli, M.Si

Penguji 1:
Drs. Epi Wadison, M. Pd

Penguji 2:
Yupika Maryansyah, M. Pd

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

UPT Perpustakaan

15 Oktober 2020

Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Bahasa Indonesia

Ary, D.. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education (7th ed.).Belmont, CA: Thompson & Wadsworth.Brown. 2004. Teaching Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.Brown, H.D. 2007. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to language Pedagogy. Third Edition. White Plains: Pearson Longman.Cahyono.2011. The Teaching Language Skill and English Language Components. Malang: State university of Malang Press.Dalman. 2013. Ketrampilan Membaca. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.Dararat.. 2012. Vocabulary instruction forstudents with learning disabilities: A review of the research. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 117-128.Day, R. and Bamfod.1998. New Ways in Teaching Reading.Teacher of English Speaker of Other Languages.Inc (TESOL1999).Dewi. 2013. The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 3-18.Grabe. W. 2002. Reading in Second Language Moving from Theory to Practice.New York. Cambridge University Press.Grabe, W. And Stoller, F.L. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. Harlow: Pearson Education.Harmer. J.2002.How To Teach English: An Introduction to The Practice Of English Language Teaching.Pearson education limitedHarmer, J. 2003. How to Teach English. Cambridge: LongmanHarmer, J. 2004. How to Teach English. Cambridge: LongmanHarris, L. A., & Smith, C. B. 1986. Reading instruction: Diagnostic teaching in the classroom. New York: MacmillanKathleen. 1986. Reading Skills for College Students. Engelwood Clipps, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc
Linnan et al. 2007. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Mark and Anderson Katy. 1998. Text Types in English. 3.2.1. ed. South Yarra: Mac Milan Education Australia PTY LTDMc Whorter. 2012. Guide to Collage Reading. Toronto: Little, Brown and CompanyMilkukecy, Beatrice.S .2011. Teaching Reading in a Second Language. Rusia: Pearson Education.IncNunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York:The McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc.Nuttal, C. 2006. Teaching Reading Skills In a Foreign Language.New Edition. Heinemann: Halley Court, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8EJOster, L. 2001. Using the Think-Aloud for Reading Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 3, 64-69.Snow, Catherine E. 2002. Reading for Understanding: Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension.Santa Monica: RANDSmith. 1983. Impact of reading purpose on incidental word learning from context. Language Learning, 52(1), 95-117.