THE ACTIVITIES OF METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGY USED BY ENGLISH STUDENTS IN READING ONLINE CLASS AT MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

THE ACTIVITIES OF METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGY USED BY ENGLISH STUDENTS IN READING ONLINE CLASS AT MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui aktivitas strategi
membaca metakognitif dan aktivitas strategi membaca metakognitif yang dominan
digunakan oleh siswa bahasa Inggris dalam kelas membaca online. Subyek
penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa bahasa Inggris semester dua di Universitas
Muhammadiyah Bengkulu tahun pelajaran 2020/2021. Siswa tersebut terdiri dari
22 siswa. Desain penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Instrumen
penelitian berupa angket dan pertanyaan terbuka. Temuan dari penelitian ini, ada
tiga puluh aktivitas strategi membaca metakognitif yang digunakan oleh siswa
bahasa Inggris dari 10 aktivitas strategi pemecahan masalah, 10 aktivitas strategi
membaca global dan 10 aktivitas strategi membaca pendukung. Selain itu, aktivitas
dominan strategi membaca metakognitif yang digunakan oleh bahasa Inggris adalah
siswa menggunakan bahan referensi (misalnya kamus online, referensi online)
untuk membantu memahami apa yang mereka baca (SUPP), mereka menyesuaikan
kecepatan membaca online (PROB), mereka memiliki tujuan mengingat ketika
membaca online (GLOB), ketika teks online menjadi sulit, mereka membaca ulang
untuk meningkatkan pemahaman mereka (PROB), dan ketika membaca online,
siswa menerjemahkan dari bahasa Inggris ke bahasa asli (SUPP), siswa membaca
perlahan dan hati-hati untuk memastikan memahami apa yang mereka baca online
(PROB), mereka berpikir tentang apa yang mereka ketahui untuk memahami apa
yang mereka baca online (GLOB), para siswa memutuskan apa yang harus dibaca
dengan cermat atau apa yang harus diabaikan (GLOB), mereka mencoba menebak
apa isinya teks online adalah tentang ketika membaca (GLOB), mereka mencoba
untuk kembali ke jalur ketika mereka kehilangan konsentrasi (PROB), ketika
membaca online, mereka memikirkan informasi dalam bahasa Inggris dan bahasa
ibu (SUPP), siswa membayar lebih dekat perhatian pada apa yang mereka baca
(PROB), dan ketika teks menjadi sulit, mereka membaca dengan keras untuk
membantu mereka memahami apa yang mereka baca (SUPP).

Setya Apriningrum
NPM.1721110070

Pembimbing
Fetriani

Penguji 1
Washlurachim Safitri

Penguji 2
Ririn Putri Ananda

ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM

UPT PERPUSTAKAAN

04 MEI 2023

UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH BENGKULU

UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH BENGKULU

PDF File

BAHASA INDONESIA

JURNAL SKRIPSI

Ahmadian, M., & Pasand, P. G. (2017). EFL Learners’ Use of Online Metacognitive
Reading Strategies and Its Relation to Their Self-Efficacy in Reading. Reading
Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(2), 117–132.
http://www.readingmatrix.com/files/17-097to04m.pdf
Amalia, E. R. (2017). The Relevance And Implications Of Metacognitive Strategy To
Reading Comprehension In EFL Classroom. EDUCATIO : Journal of Education,
2(2). https://doi.org/10.29138/educatio.v2i2.188
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and
Learning. ERIC Digest.
Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading
strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, i,(3) 1–33.
Retrieved March, 10, 2006.
Anggraini, R., & Saputra, E. (2020). AN ANALYSIS OF
LECTURERS’METACOGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES IN TEACHING
ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNER AT ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM
OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU. The Seall Journal,
1(2), 18–24.
Annury, M. N., Mujiyanto, J., Saleh, M., & Sutopo, D. (2019). The Use of
Metacognitive Strategies in EFL Reading Comprehension. 343(Icas), 62–66.
https://doi.org/10.2991/icas-19.2019.13
Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching
activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register
Journal, 13(1), 49–76.
Aziz, Z. A., Nasir, C., & Ramazani, R. (2019). Applying metacognitive strategies in
comprehending English reading texts. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English
Language Teaching & Literature, 19(1), 138–159.
Bang, J. (2020). Differences in Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Use in
English Test-typed Text Reading between Gifted English Language Learners and
General Middle School Learners. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association,
20(1), 345–355.
Bhagat, R., & Hovy, E. (2013). What is a paraphrase? Computational Linguistics,
39(3), 463–472.
Cahyaningsih, R., Mujiyanto, J., & Khumaedi, M. (2020). Skill Learning Engineering
Reading English Through Metacognitive Strategy In Industrial Era 4.0.
48
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Science, Education and
Technology, ISET 2019, 29th June 2019, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.
Djiwandono, P. I. (2001). Strategi Membaca Bhs. Inggris. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Djuharie, O. S. (2008). Intensive Reading Bottom-up Reading. Bandung: Penerbit
Yrama Widya.
Duke, N. (2003). Comprehension instruction for informational text. Presentation at the
Annual Meeting of the Michigan Reading Association, Grand Rapids, MI.
Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching: Reading. Routledge.
Ilahude, F. F., Fatsah, H., Luwiti, S. R., & Otoluwa, M. H. (2021). The influence of the
use of context clues strategy on reading comprehension. International Journal of
Education and Social Science Research, 4(6), 166–180.
Jamilah, N. (2021). The effectiveness of using metacognitive strategy to teach online
reading comprehension for English Young Learners. Journal of Research on
English and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 2(1), 61–67.
Keene, E. O., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension
in a reader’s workshop. ERIC.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age
International.
Lonsdale, M. D. S. (2014). The effect of text layout on performance: A comparison
between types of questions that require different reading processes. Information
Design Journal, 21(3), 279–299.
MAGEE, G. A. (2018). Metacognitive reading strategy use and reading
comprehension in English of first-year students at a Japanese university.
Mendikbud, R. I. (2020). Tentang Pemberlakuan Pembelajaran Secara Daring dan
Bekerja dari Rumah dalam Rangka Pencegahan Penyebaran COVID-19. Tentang
Pemberlakuan Pembelajaran Secara Daring Dan Bekerja Dari Rumah Dalam
Rangka Pencegahan Penyebaran COVID-19.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness
of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249.
Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course
‘forced’online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for
Teaching, 46(4), 609–611.
Mudra, H. (2018). Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies among Pre-Service EFL
Teachers in Indonesia. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(2), 151–
49
164. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2018.72.5
Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The
effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading
comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–
862. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a
Ofodu, G. O., & Adedipe, T. H. (2011). Assessing ESL students’ awareness and
application of metacognitive strategies in comprehending academic materials.
Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2(5),
343–346.
Park, H.-R., & Kim, D. (2017). English language learners’ strategies for reading online
texts: Influential factors and patterns of use at home and in school. International
Journal of Educational Research, 82, 63–74.
Putri, N. O., Sutisna, E., & Wahyuni, A. (2021). Metacognitive Strategy on Students’
Literal and Inferential Comprehension in L2 Reading. Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah
Pendidikan, 13(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagogia.v13i2.4506
Rahayu, A. U. (2015). Differences on Language Structure between English and
Indonesian. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(4),
257–260. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2015.1.4.49
Rianto, A. (2021). Indonesian EFL university students’ metacognitive online reading
strategies before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Studies in English Language
and Education, 8(1), 16–33.
Rohmatillah, R. (2014). A STUDY ON STUDENTS’DIFFICULTIES IN LEARNING
VOCABULARY. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 6(1), 75–93.
Sitindaon, M., Wijaya, B., & Salam, U. (2013). Metacognitive online reading strategy
practiced by English students. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa
(JPPK), 2(11).
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading
comprehension. Rand Corporation.
Usman, B., Aziz, Z. A., & Absida, N. R. (2017). Improving reading comprehension
using metacognitive strategies. English Education Journal, 8(4), 425–438.
Wardah, W. (2014). Metacognitive Reading Strategy Enhancing English Reading
Comprehension. At-Turats, 8 (1).
Wibowo, Y., Syafrizal, S., & Syafryadin, S. (2020). An analysis of English teachers’
strategies in teaching reading Comprehension. JALL (Journal of Applied
Linguistics and Literacy), 4(1), 20–27.
50
Zeitzoff, H. (2005). Using Context Clues to Help Kids Tackle Unfamiliar Words.
Scholastic Incorporated.
Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading
achievement: insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign
Language Teaching, 10(1).
Zimmermann, S., & Hutchins, C. (2008). 7 keys to comprehension: How to help your
kids read it and get it! Harmony.