COMPARING STUDENTS’ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING ENGLISH PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE SKILLSAT ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

Dublin Core

Title

COMPARING STUDENTS’ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING ENGLISH PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE SKILLSAT ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

Description

The objective of this research is to compare students’ Achievement in Learning English Productive and Receptive Skills atMuhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. This study examines to know the significant different achievement between students in learning English productive and receptive skills at the third semester of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. The population is all of the students. The research instruments documentation. The quantitative data will be analyzed using t-test. The result showed that there is significant difference between students in learning English productive and receptive skills achievement at the third semester of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. t-count is higher than t-table in (5.581 >1.996). Based on the result above, it is important for the lecturer to pay attention more to the students’ improvement in studying English, especially in productive and receptive skills.

Creator

RINA DWI ANGGRAINI
NPM: 1521110019
Pembimbing I:
Drs. Arasuli, M. Si
Pembimbing II:
Fetriani, M. Pd
Penguji 1:
Ivan Achmad N, M. Pd
Penguji 2:
Drs. Epi Wadison, M. Pd

Source

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Publisher

UPT Perpustakaan

Date

15 Oktober 2020

Contributor

Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Rights

Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Language

Bahasa Indonesia

Identifier

Adelmann, K. (2012). The Art of Listening in an Educational Perspectives Listening Reception in the Mother Tounge. Journal of Education Inquiry, Volune 3 No 4, December 2012; Retrieved from https://dspace.mah.se/bitstream/handle/2043/15340/108978_the_art_of_eduinq_vol3_no4_dec12_513_534.pdf.On Saturday 21st, 2017.AbdulChaer,(2009,134) PsikolinguistikkajianteoritikJakarta:RinekaCipta.Al-Shumaimeri, Yousef AN. (2005). Gender Differences in Reading Comprehension Performance in Relation to Content Familiarity of Gender-Neutral Texts.In Second International Conference: Language, Culture and Literature. Minia University, Egypt.AnasSudijono, (2011)pengantarStatistikpendidikan,Jakarta:RajawaliPers.Anderson, Paul S.(1972). Language skill in Elementary Education.New York: Macmillan Publishing Co; Inc.Ary, Donald et al. (2010).Introduction to Research in Education. United States: Wads worth Thomson Learning.Brown.(2003). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices.California: Longman University Press.Brown, D.H. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. 3rdEdition. White Plains: Addison Wesley Longman.Burns & Joyce. (1997). Focus on speaking. Syedney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.Bertolini, Katherine &Stremmel, Thorngren. 2012. Student Achievement Factors. South Dakota State University College of Education and Human Sciences Department of Teaching, Learning and LeadershipChastain, K. (1998). Developing Second Language skills. 3rd U.S.A: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.Denga, D. I. (1998). Educational measurement, continuous assessment and psychological testing.Calabar: Rapid Educational publishers.Douglas, J. W. E. (2004). The home in the school. London: Mac gibbon Publishing Corporation.
Ellis, Rod.(1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition.New York: Oxford University Press.Eric Jonson. ( 2010, 53.) Guru Super and Super Teaching. Jakarta: IndeksGay. L.R.(2000). Educational Research. London: Merrill Publishing.Gebhard, J.G. (2006). Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language: A Teacher Self-Development and Methodology Guide.Ann Arbor: The Uniuversity of Michigan Press.Ghaith, G. (2002). The nature of writing stages.Online at nadabs. Tripad.comHarmer, J. (2001).The Practice English Language Teaching.The 3thedition.Pearson Longman Cambridge : UKHarmer, J. (2007).The Practice English Language Teaching.The 4thedition.Pearson Longman Cambridge: UKHasyuni. (2006). The students preffered activities for english listening classes ( A survey conducted to the seconssd and fourth semester students of EnglishDepartment of FkipUniversitas Bengkulu Academic year 2005/2006). Unpublished thesis of teacher training and education faculty of Universitas Bengkulu.Hayriye, Kayi. (2006:1). Teaching Speaking: Activities to promote speaking in second language. September10th.Helgesen, M. (2003).Listening in practical language teaching.Edited by David Nunan, McGraw Hill.Holmes, Janet. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistic. The 2thedition.Published by Routledge. New York: Third Avenue.IqramHossain, Mohammed. (2015). Teaching Productive Skills to the Students: A Secondary Level Scenario. BRAC University, Dhaka, BangladeshMarijanaIvančić and AnakatarinaMandić (2014) Morrow, K. (2004).Insights from the Common European Framework.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Nunan.(1991:47). Language teaching Methodology a textbook for teachers.New York: McGraw Hill Company.Nunan.(2003). Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: McGraw Hill Company.
Patel, M. F & Jain, P.M. (2008).English Language Teaching: Methods,Tools, and Techniques.Jaipur: Sunrise Publisher and Distributors.Rifa’I&Anni.(2009:85) PsikologiPendidikan. Semarang unnes press.Rost.(2002). Teaching and Researching Listening. London: Longman.Sanjaya.(2008:13). StrategiPembelajaranBerorientasiStandar Proses Pendidikan.Jakarta: KencanaPrenadaGrup.Santoso, Singgih. 2014. Complete Guides to SPSS version 20 revised Edition. Jakarta: PT Alex Media Komputindo.Sunarto.(2009). PengertianPrestasiBelajar.Jurnaldiakses 3 april 2010. http://sunartombs.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/pengertian-prestasi-belajar/.

Citation

RINA DWI ANGGRAINI NPM: 1521110019 et al., “COMPARING STUDENTS’ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING ENGLISH PRODUCTIVE AND RECEPTIVE SKILLSAT ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU,” Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, accessed September 22, 2025, https://repo.umb.ac.id/items/show/394.