THE EFFECT OF USING POSSE (PREDICT, ORGANIZE,
SEARCH, SUMMARIZE, EVALUATE) STRATEGY IN
READING COMPREHENSION AT THIRD SEMESTER
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU
Dublin Core
Title
THE EFFECT OF USING POSSE (PREDICT, ORGANIZE,
SEARCH, SUMMARIZE, EVALUATE) STRATEGY IN
READING COMPREHENSION AT THIRD SEMESTER
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU
SEARCH, SUMMARIZE, EVALUATE) STRATEGY IN
READING COMPREHENSION AT THIRD SEMESTER
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU
Description
The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of using POSSE
Strategy toward Students‟ Reading Comprehension at Third Semester English
Study Program Students of UMB. In this research, researcher conducted a quasiexperimental
design by using quantitative method. The samples of this research
were divided two clasess, they are class IIIA as the experimental group and the
class IIIB as the control group because class IIIA got lower score on pretest than
class IIIB. Each class consisted of 15 students. So, total number of sample in this
research were 30 students. There were two instruments used in collecting data,
they were reading test and interview. There were twenty questions as the reading
test of this research. In collecting the data, the researcher did two procedures of
treatment, namely experiment Class and Control class. In teaching reading
comprehension using POSSE strategy, the students followed five steps Predict,
Organize, Search, Summarize, and Evaluate. The students first predict what the
text about based on their existing knowledge, and then organize their thought.
Next, Students search for the structure of the text, after that they summarize the
main idea in their own words. Finally, they evaluate their understanding by
comparing, clarifying, and predicting.The finding of the research showed that
there is a significant difference in post-test results between the group that was
taught with POSSE strategy and the group that was taught with conventional
technique at third semester English Study Program Students of University
Muhammadiyah Bengkulu. Moreover, the finding of this research confirmed the
hypothesis of this research. It was suggested for the students, they can use POSSE
strategy to be careful readers in reading then they can build their critical thinking
while applying this strategy
Strategy toward Students‟ Reading Comprehension at Third Semester English
Study Program Students of UMB. In this research, researcher conducted a quasiexperimental
design by using quantitative method. The samples of this research
were divided two clasess, they are class IIIA as the experimental group and the
class IIIB as the control group because class IIIA got lower score on pretest than
class IIIB. Each class consisted of 15 students. So, total number of sample in this
research were 30 students. There were two instruments used in collecting data,
they were reading test and interview. There were twenty questions as the reading
test of this research. In collecting the data, the researcher did two procedures of
treatment, namely experiment Class and Control class. In teaching reading
comprehension using POSSE strategy, the students followed five steps Predict,
Organize, Search, Summarize, and Evaluate. The students first predict what the
text about based on their existing knowledge, and then organize their thought.
Next, Students search for the structure of the text, after that they summarize the
main idea in their own words. Finally, they evaluate their understanding by
comparing, clarifying, and predicting.The finding of the research showed that
there is a significant difference in post-test results between the group that was
taught with POSSE strategy and the group that was taught with conventional
technique at third semester English Study Program Students of University
Muhammadiyah Bengkulu. Moreover, the finding of this research confirmed the
hypothesis of this research. It was suggested for the students, they can use POSSE
strategy to be careful readers in reading then they can build their critical thinking
while applying this strategy
Creator
HENGKI TARNANDO
NPM. 1521110034
NPM. 1521110034
Pembimbing:
Eki Saputra, M.Pd
Eki Saputra, M.Pd
Penguji i:
Dr. Dian Susyla, M.Pd
Dr. Dian Susyla, M.Pd
Penguji II:
Agung Suhadi, M.A
Agung Suhadi, M.A
Source
ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
Publisher
UPT Perpustakaan
Date
04 November 2021
Contributor
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Rights
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Language
Bahasa inggris
Identifier
Afflerbach et al. 2008. Clarifying Differences between Reading Skills and
Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5): 364-373.
Arikunto,Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian (Suatu Pendekatan Praktis).
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bamford, J., Day, R. (Eds.) 2004. Extensive Reading Activities for Teaching
Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Barry, A. L. 2002. Reading Strategies Teachers Say They Use. Journal of
Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(2): 132-141.
Blackhowic. 2008. Reading Comprehension: Strategies for Independent
Learners: Second Edition . New York: The Guilford Press.
Boyle, Joseph & Scanlon,David. 2010. Methods And Strategies for Teaching
Students With Mild Disabilities. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Brassell, Danny, et all. 2008. Comprehension that Works: Taking Students Beyond
Ordinary Understanding to Deep Comprehension. Huntington Beach:
Corrine Burton.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2002. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching:
Fourth Edition. New York: Pearson Education.
Catherine. 2002. A Practical Guide to Research Methods, How to Content,
Oxford.
Sugeng, B & Zaimah, N. 2012. Contextual English 1 for Grade X of Senior High
School: Platinum
Davies, Paul and Eric Pearse. 2000. Success in Language Teaching. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Day, R., Bamford, J., 2002. Top Ten Principles for Teaching Extensive Reading.
Reading in a Foreign Language 14,136–141.
<http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2002/day/day.pdf>retrieved
08.09.2015.
Dole et al. 1991. Moving from the Old to the New: Research in Reading
Comprehension Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2): 239-
264.
Durkit. 1993. Strategy Instruction for Students with Learning Difficulties:
StrategiesIn Reading Comprehension.New York : The Guildford Press.
Eka and Berlin.2013. The Effect of Applying POSSE (Predict- Organize-Search-
Summarize-Evaluate) On The Students‟ Reading Comprehension.
Elizabeth. 2003. Teaching & Learning in The Language Classroom. UK: OUP.
Fitria, Reni. 2014. Teaching Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text By
Using Summarization Technique At The Eleventh Grade Students Of Senior
High School 1 North Bengkulu.
Freville, C.Ben& Reardon, Colleen. 2006.Supporting The Learning of Students
with Disabilities: A Guide To The Use of Digitized Primary Sources. Web.
20 September 2015. <http://tps.nl.edu/AAM%20Guide%20-%203-17-
06.pdf>.
Grabe and Stoller. 2002. English Language Teaching: Methods, Tools, And
Technique. New York:Sunrise Publisher and Distribution.
Hedge, Tricia. 2003. Teaching & Learning in The Language Classroom. UK:
OUP.
Iskandar. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (Kuantitatif Dan
Kualitatif). Jakarta: GP Press.
Julian Hermida. 2001. The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research.
JosoTL Vol. 2, Number 1.
Kartini, Emi. 2014. A THESIS. Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension
Achievement Using Question Quides Strategy.
Klingner, Janette & Vaughn, Sharon.2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to
Students with Learning Difficulties.New York: The Guildford Press.
Knaap, Peter. 2005. Genre, Text, And Grammar . Sydney: University of New
South Wales
Kusnita, Amelia. 2014. A THESIS. Teaching Reading Comprehension of Report
Texts Through Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) Strategy (A Study At
Ninth Grade Students Of Smpn 1 Tetap, South Kaur Academic Year
2013/2014).
Lems, et al. 2010. Teaching Reading to English Language Learners Insights from
Linguistics. New York: The Divison of Guiford Publications, Inc.
Loucky, J. P. 2003.Enhancing Students' English Reading and Vocabulary Skills
Using CALL Innovations. Seinan Women's University, Tandai Kiyo, Vol.
49.
Meljulita and Herfina. 2013. The Effect of Using Predict, Organize, Search,
Summarize, Evaluate (Posse) Strategy Toward Students‟ Reading
Comprehension (A Study at the Grade VIII Students of SMPN 2 Jujuhan
Rantau Ikil)”
Moleong Lexy J. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Ngalim, Purwanto. 2004. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran.
Bandung:Remaja Rosdakaya
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York:The
McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc.
Pang, Elizabeth S., et, all. 2003. Educational Practices Series -12: Teaching
Reading. Geneva: International Bureau Educational.
Patel and Jain. 2008. English Language Teaching: Methods, Tools, and
Technique. New York:Sunrise Publisher and Distribution.
Petter. 2005. POSSE Strategy in Reading. New York the McGraw-Hill
Companies,Inc.
Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 2009. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi
Pengajaran.Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Reardon, Colleen. Increasing the Accessibility of Primary Sources Thorough
Activation Background Knowledge, Vocabulary Development and Strategic
Instruction. January 2009. Web. 20 September 2015. < http://
tps.nl.edu/TPSJournalreardon11.htm>
Richards, J.C., Schmidt, R., 2003. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching
and Applied Linguistics, third ed. Pearson Education, London.
Sanggam Siahaan and Kisno Shinoda. 2008. Generic Text Structure. Yogyakarta:
Graha Ilmu.
Scharlach, T. 2008. START Comprehending: Students and Teachers Actively
Reading Text. the Reading Teacher, 62(1): 20-31.
Seyler, Dorothy U. 2004. The Readingcontext: Developing College Reading Skills. New York :Pearson Education, Inc.
Snow, Catherine E. 2002. Reading for Understanding: Toward Research and
Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica: Rand.
Stringer, Ernest. 2007. Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Publications.
Trianto. 2007. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik.
Jakarta :PrestasiPustaka.
Vygotsky,L.S.1978.MindinSociety.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.
Westwood, Peter. 2008. What Teachers Need to Know About Reading and Writing
Difficulties. Victoria: ACER Pres.
Wiwi. 2013. A THESIS. Combining POSSE Strategy and Reciprocal Teaching
Strategy for Teaching Reading Comprehension of Expository Text in Senior
High School.
Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5): 364-373.
Arikunto,Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian (Suatu Pendekatan Praktis).
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bamford, J., Day, R. (Eds.) 2004. Extensive Reading Activities for Teaching
Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Barry, A. L. 2002. Reading Strategies Teachers Say They Use. Journal of
Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(2): 132-141.
Blackhowic. 2008. Reading Comprehension: Strategies for Independent
Learners: Second Edition . New York: The Guilford Press.
Boyle, Joseph & Scanlon,David. 2010. Methods And Strategies for Teaching
Students With Mild Disabilities. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Brassell, Danny, et all. 2008. Comprehension that Works: Taking Students Beyond
Ordinary Understanding to Deep Comprehension. Huntington Beach:
Corrine Burton.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2002. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching:
Fourth Edition. New York: Pearson Education.
Catherine. 2002. A Practical Guide to Research Methods, How to Content,
Oxford.
Sugeng, B & Zaimah, N. 2012. Contextual English 1 for Grade X of Senior High
School: Platinum
Davies, Paul and Eric Pearse. 2000. Success in Language Teaching. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Day, R., Bamford, J., 2002. Top Ten Principles for Teaching Extensive Reading.
Reading in a Foreign Language 14,136–141.
<http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2002/day/day.pdf>retrieved
08.09.2015.
Dole et al. 1991. Moving from the Old to the New: Research in Reading
Comprehension Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2): 239-
264.
Durkit. 1993. Strategy Instruction for Students with Learning Difficulties:
StrategiesIn Reading Comprehension.New York : The Guildford Press.
Eka and Berlin.2013. The Effect of Applying POSSE (Predict- Organize-Search-
Summarize-Evaluate) On The Students‟ Reading Comprehension.
Elizabeth. 2003. Teaching & Learning in The Language Classroom. UK: OUP.
Fitria, Reni. 2014. Teaching Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text By
Using Summarization Technique At The Eleventh Grade Students Of Senior
High School 1 North Bengkulu.
Freville, C.Ben& Reardon, Colleen. 2006.Supporting The Learning of Students
with Disabilities: A Guide To The Use of Digitized Primary Sources. Web.
20 September 2015. <http://tps.nl.edu/AAM%20Guide%20-%203-17-
06.pdf>.
Grabe and Stoller. 2002. English Language Teaching: Methods, Tools, And
Technique. New York:Sunrise Publisher and Distribution.
Hedge, Tricia. 2003. Teaching & Learning in The Language Classroom. UK:
OUP.
Iskandar. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (Kuantitatif Dan
Kualitatif). Jakarta: GP Press.
Julian Hermida. 2001. The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research.
JosoTL Vol. 2, Number 1.
Kartini, Emi. 2014. A THESIS. Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension
Achievement Using Question Quides Strategy.
Klingner, Janette & Vaughn, Sharon.2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to
Students with Learning Difficulties.New York: The Guildford Press.
Knaap, Peter. 2005. Genre, Text, And Grammar . Sydney: University of New
South Wales
Kusnita, Amelia. 2014. A THESIS. Teaching Reading Comprehension of Report
Texts Through Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) Strategy (A Study At
Ninth Grade Students Of Smpn 1 Tetap, South Kaur Academic Year
2013/2014).
Lems, et al. 2010. Teaching Reading to English Language Learners Insights from
Linguistics. New York: The Divison of Guiford Publications, Inc.
Loucky, J. P. 2003.Enhancing Students' English Reading and Vocabulary Skills
Using CALL Innovations. Seinan Women's University, Tandai Kiyo, Vol.
49.
Meljulita and Herfina. 2013. The Effect of Using Predict, Organize, Search,
Summarize, Evaluate (Posse) Strategy Toward Students‟ Reading
Comprehension (A Study at the Grade VIII Students of SMPN 2 Jujuhan
Rantau Ikil)”
Moleong Lexy J. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Ngalim, Purwanto. 2004. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran.
Bandung:Remaja Rosdakaya
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York:The
McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc.
Pang, Elizabeth S., et, all. 2003. Educational Practices Series -12: Teaching
Reading. Geneva: International Bureau Educational.
Patel and Jain. 2008. English Language Teaching: Methods, Tools, and
Technique. New York:Sunrise Publisher and Distribution.
Petter. 2005. POSSE Strategy in Reading. New York the McGraw-Hill
Companies,Inc.
Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 2009. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi
Pengajaran.Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Reardon, Colleen. Increasing the Accessibility of Primary Sources Thorough
Activation Background Knowledge, Vocabulary Development and Strategic
Instruction. January 2009. Web. 20 September 2015. < http://
tps.nl.edu/TPSJournalreardon11.htm>
Richards, J.C., Schmidt, R., 2003. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching
and Applied Linguistics, third ed. Pearson Education, London.
Sanggam Siahaan and Kisno Shinoda. 2008. Generic Text Structure. Yogyakarta:
Graha Ilmu.
Scharlach, T. 2008. START Comprehending: Students and Teachers Actively
Reading Text. the Reading Teacher, 62(1): 20-31.
Seyler, Dorothy U. 2004. The Readingcontext: Developing College Reading Skills. New York :Pearson Education, Inc.
Snow, Catherine E. 2002. Reading for Understanding: Toward Research and
Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica: Rand.
Stringer, Ernest. 2007. Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Publications.
Trianto. 2007. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik.
Jakarta :PrestasiPustaka.
Vygotsky,L.S.1978.MindinSociety.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.
Westwood, Peter. 2008. What Teachers Need to Know About Reading and Writing
Difficulties. Victoria: ACER Pres.
Wiwi. 2013. A THESIS. Combining POSSE Strategy and Reciprocal Teaching
Strategy for Teaching Reading Comprehension of Expository Text in Senior
High School.
Collection
Citation
HENGKI TARNANDO
NPM. 1521110034 et al., “THE EFFECT OF USING POSSE (PREDICT, ORGANIZE,
SEARCH, SUMMARIZE, EVALUATE) STRATEGY IN
READING COMPREHENSION AT THIRD SEMESTER
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU,” Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, accessed April 26, 2024, http://repo.umb.ac.id/items/show/2553.
SEARCH, SUMMARIZE, EVALUATE) STRATEGY IN
READING COMPREHENSION AT THIRD SEMESTER
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU,” Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, accessed April 26, 2024, http://repo.umb.ac.id/items/show/2553.