THE EFFECT OF PLUS, MINUS, INTERESTING STRATEGY (PMI) ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL SKILLS IN SPEAKING FOR DEBATE CLASS AT ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU
Dublin Core
Title
THE EFFECT OF PLUS, MINUS, INTERESTING STRATEGY (PMI) ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL SKILLS IN SPEAKING FOR DEBATE CLASS AT ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU
Description
The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of using Plus, Minus,
Interesting (PMI) Strategy on students‟ critical skill in speaking for debate. The
design of this research is quasi experimental method. The subjects of this research
were 20 students. The instrument used in this research was a test. There were two
kinds of test, pre-test and post-test. Pre-test was given before the treatment and posttest after the treatment. The result showed that, there was an increased scores in
students‟ who used Plus, Minus, Interesting (PMI) Strategy. Although T-count was
lower than T-table (1.3333 < 1.68595) where the total score was 838 and mean score
was 83.8 for experimental group. In control group the total score was 798 and mean
score was 79,8. The researcher suggested that this strategy is recomended to teach
speaking for debate in the class to increase students‟ score. With this technique the
students be more active in the classroom and they not affraid to share their idea again
and speak in front of the class. It means that Plus Minus Interesting (PMI) technique
was effective strategy for teaching speaking at the Eight Semester of Muhammadiyah
University of Bengkulu.
Interesting (PMI) Strategy on students‟ critical skill in speaking for debate. The
design of this research is quasi experimental method. The subjects of this research
were 20 students. The instrument used in this research was a test. There were two
kinds of test, pre-test and post-test. Pre-test was given before the treatment and posttest after the treatment. The result showed that, there was an increased scores in
students‟ who used Plus, Minus, Interesting (PMI) Strategy. Although T-count was
lower than T-table (1.3333 < 1.68595) where the total score was 838 and mean score
was 83.8 for experimental group. In control group the total score was 798 and mean
score was 79,8. The researcher suggested that this strategy is recomended to teach
speaking for debate in the class to increase students‟ score. With this technique the
students be more active in the classroom and they not affraid to share their idea again
and speak in front of the class. It means that Plus Minus Interesting (PMI) technique
was effective strategy for teaching speaking at the Eight Semester of Muhammadiyah
University of Bengkulu.
Creator
SULISTINA AGUSTIN
NPM. 1621110052
NPM. 1621110052
Advisor
Ria Angraini
Ria Angraini
Examiner 1
Dian Suslya
Dian Suslya
Examiner 2
Yupika Maryansyah
Yupika Maryansyah
Source
ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM
Publisher
UPT PERPUSTAKAAN
Date
14 JULY 2023
Contributor
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU
Rights
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU
Format
PDF File
Language
BAHASA INGGRIS
Type
JURNAL SKRIPSI
Identifier
Ahmed, M.T. & Omutunde, H. (2012). Theories and strategies of good decision
making. International journal of scientific & technology research, 1(10), 51-
54.
Azis, A. (2015). The Improvment of The Students’speaking Proficiency Through Plus,
Minus, Interesting (PMI). Strategy. Jkip (Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu
Pendidikan), 2(1), 45-55.
Bailey, K.M. & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: speaking
Barry, M. (2012). What skills will you need to succeed in the future. Phoenix
Forward.
Bonk, C. J. & Smith, G. S. (1998). Alternative Instructional Strategies for Creative
and Critical Thinking in the Accounting Curriculum. Journal of accounting
education, 16(2), 261-293.
Boonjeam, W., Tesaputa, K., & Sri-ampai, A. (2017). Program Development for
Primary School Teachers' Critical Thinking. International Education
Studies, 10(2), 131-138.
Conklin, W. (2012). Strategies for Developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Grades
6-12. Shell Education.
De Bono, E. (2006). De Bono's thinking course. Pearson Education.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2010). Critical Thinking: Competency Standards Essential for
the Cultivation of Intellectual Skills, Part 1. Journal of Developmental
Education, 34(2), 38-39.
Facione, P. 1990. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of
educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report.
Gotoh, Y. 2016. Development of Critical Thinking with Metacognitive
Regulation. International Association for Development of the Information
Society.
54
Hasanah, R. 2019. Teaching Speaking Using Plus Minus Interesting (PMI) Technique
(A Quasi-Experimental Research at the Tenth Grade of SMA Muhammadiyah
3 Jetis in the Academic Year 2017/2018. (Doctoral Dissertation, IAIN
Ponorogo).
Halpern, D. F. 2013. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking.
Psychology Press.
Ingraham, E. C., & Peterson, D. L. 2004. Assessing the impact of study abroad on
student learning at Michigan State University. Frontiers: The interdisciplinary
journal of study abroad, 10(1), 83-100.
Kivunja, C. 2015. Using de bono’s six thinking hats model to teach critical thinking
and problem solving skills essential for success in the 21st century
economy. Creative Education, 6(03), 380.
Kurnia, E. 2013. The Effect Of Using Plus Minus Interesting Technique Toward
Students’speaking Ability At The Second Year Of State Senior High School 2
Pekanbaru. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif
Kasim Riau.
Mirawati, M., & Amri, Z. 2013. Improving Students’speaking Ability Through Pmi
(Plus, Minus, And Interesting) Strategy At Junior High School. Journal of
English Language Teaching, 1(2), 216-223
Nikijuluw, R. C., & Puspitasari, D. 2018. The Influence of Plus, Minus and
Interesting (PMI) Strategy towards Students' Speaking Ability in an
Indonesian Private Secondary School. International Journal of Language
Education, 2(2), 113-121.
Thituyetanh, N.( 2015). The key principles for development of speaking. International
Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(1), 49-53.
Ramadhani, Putri. (2020). The Effect of Using Read, Cover, Remember, Retell
(RCRR) Strategy on Students’ Reading Comprehension at the Eight Semester
of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu.
making. International journal of scientific & technology research, 1(10), 51-
54.
Azis, A. (2015). The Improvment of The Students’speaking Proficiency Through Plus,
Minus, Interesting (PMI). Strategy. Jkip (Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu
Pendidikan), 2(1), 45-55.
Bailey, K.M. & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: speaking
Barry, M. (2012). What skills will you need to succeed in the future. Phoenix
Forward.
Bonk, C. J. & Smith, G. S. (1998). Alternative Instructional Strategies for Creative
and Critical Thinking in the Accounting Curriculum. Journal of accounting
education, 16(2), 261-293.
Boonjeam, W., Tesaputa, K., & Sri-ampai, A. (2017). Program Development for
Primary School Teachers' Critical Thinking. International Education
Studies, 10(2), 131-138.
Conklin, W. (2012). Strategies for Developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Grades
6-12. Shell Education.
De Bono, E. (2006). De Bono's thinking course. Pearson Education.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2010). Critical Thinking: Competency Standards Essential for
the Cultivation of Intellectual Skills, Part 1. Journal of Developmental
Education, 34(2), 38-39.
Facione, P. 1990. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of
educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report.
Gotoh, Y. 2016. Development of Critical Thinking with Metacognitive
Regulation. International Association for Development of the Information
Society.
54
Hasanah, R. 2019. Teaching Speaking Using Plus Minus Interesting (PMI) Technique
(A Quasi-Experimental Research at the Tenth Grade of SMA Muhammadiyah
3 Jetis in the Academic Year 2017/2018. (Doctoral Dissertation, IAIN
Ponorogo).
Halpern, D. F. 2013. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking.
Psychology Press.
Ingraham, E. C., & Peterson, D. L. 2004. Assessing the impact of study abroad on
student learning at Michigan State University. Frontiers: The interdisciplinary
journal of study abroad, 10(1), 83-100.
Kivunja, C. 2015. Using de bono’s six thinking hats model to teach critical thinking
and problem solving skills essential for success in the 21st century
economy. Creative Education, 6(03), 380.
Kurnia, E. 2013. The Effect Of Using Plus Minus Interesting Technique Toward
Students’speaking Ability At The Second Year Of State Senior High School 2
Pekanbaru. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif
Kasim Riau.
Mirawati, M., & Amri, Z. 2013. Improving Students’speaking Ability Through Pmi
(Plus, Minus, And Interesting) Strategy At Junior High School. Journal of
English Language Teaching, 1(2), 216-223
Nikijuluw, R. C., & Puspitasari, D. 2018. The Influence of Plus, Minus and
Interesting (PMI) Strategy towards Students' Speaking Ability in an
Indonesian Private Secondary School. International Journal of Language
Education, 2(2), 113-121.
Thituyetanh, N.( 2015). The key principles for development of speaking. International
Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(1), 49-53.
Ramadhani, Putri. (2020). The Effect of Using Read, Cover, Remember, Retell
(RCRR) Strategy on Students’ Reading Comprehension at the Eight Semester
of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu.
Collection
Citation
SULISTINA AGUSTIN
NPM. 1621110052
et al., “THE EFFECT OF PLUS, MINUS, INTERESTING STRATEGY (PMI) ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL SKILLS IN SPEAKING FOR DEBATE CLASS AT ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU,” Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, accessed May 3, 2024, http://repo.umb.ac.id/items/show/3849.