A Study of Speech Transitions Used by English Students in Speaking for Speech in Third Semester of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu

A Study of Speech Transitions Used by English Students in Speaking for Speech in Third Semester of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu

The objectives of this researchwere to knowthe useof speech transitions type in speaking for speech class. In this study was used descriptive qualitativeresearchdesign. The instruments of the research were table checklist and video recorder. The subject of this study was 49 students in speaking for speech class. The researcher found there were 106 frequency of speech transitions consisted of 22 frequencies in sentence connector, 82 frequencies in clause connector, and 2 frequencies in other connector. So, the researcher found in the first speech transition as sentence connector the most dominant used by English students was for example, The second, in speech transition as clause connector the most dominant used by English students was and, The third, in speech transition as other connector the most dominant used by English students was such as. Then, the dominant clause was clause connector “and”.After completing this research, the researcher suggests forthe students to use complete speech transitions types

RECHA BUNA SILVA
NPM: 1521110020

Pembimbing:
Washlurachim Safitri, M. Pd

Penguji 1:
Arasuli, M. Pd

Penguji 2:
Ririn Putri Ananda, M. Pd

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

UPT Perpustakaan

15 Oktober 2020

Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Bahasa Indonesia

Adjie, A. A. 2014. The Handling of Subordinate Clauses By Students of Teacher Training Colleges: A Study of Selected Teacher Training Colleges in Ashanti Region. International Journal of English Language Teaching.Vol.2, No.3Aristotle. Knudsen, Rachel Ahern. 2014. Homeric Speech and the Origins of Rhetoric. United States: Johns Hopkins University Press.Aristotle. Kennedy, George Alexander, 1994. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. United States: Princeton University Press.Ary, et all. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education.Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Biber Douglas, at all. 1999. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. University College.LondonBrown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching 4th Edition.Addison Wesley Longman. New YorkBrown, H.D. 2003.Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices.Addison Wesley Longman. New YorkBygate, M. 2010. Language Teaching Speaking.Oxford University Press. New YorkCroon-Mills, Daniel. 2007. Speech Communication.Armstrong Hall: College of Arts and Hummanities.Gilbert H. Hunt. 2009. Effective Teaching: Prepare and Implementation. Springfield, Illinois: United States of America.Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, Christion. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rdedition).London: Oxford University Press. Inc.Hamilton, Cheryl. 2012. Essential of Public Speaking. Australia: Wadsworth Chengage Learning.Hedge, Tricia. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.Mack, N & Woodsong, C et all. 2011. Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector‟s Field Guide.Fhi,USA.
Marlena, H. 2010. English Student‟s Ability in Recognizing Subordinate Clause In Compound Sentence. Thesis in UMB. UnpublishedMiller, A. B. 1984. Modes of Public Speaking. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Oshima,Alice,and Hague.1998.Writing academic English .Third edition. United States : Longman.Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language; An Introduction to The Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Shabani, M.B. 2013. The Effect of Background Knowledge on Speaking Ability of Iranian EFL learners. International SAMNM Journal of Marketing and Management. Vol. 1, No.1, 2013.